Video

To 'Hack Back' or Not?

Attorneys David Navetta, Ron Raether on Active Defense
To 'Hack Back' or Not?

In the wake of damaging cyberattacks, organizations are looking not just to repel the attacks, but to strike back and shut down the attackers. This "hack-back" strategy - or "active defense," as it's come to be known - is controversial because of its legal implications.

See Also: Three and a Half Crimeware Trends to Watch in 2017

In this video interview, two noted security/privacy attorneys discuss:

  • The argument for active defense tactics;
  • Potential consequences from collateral damage;
  • When is a 'hack-back' approach appropriate?

Navetta is co-founder of the Information Law Group and co-chairman of the American Bar Association's Information Security Committee. He has been a keen observer of information security-related litigation, including financial fraud and state privacy laws.

Raether is partner at Faruki Ireland & Cox in Dayton, Ohio. His experience with technology-related issues spans an array of legal areas, including patent; antitrust; licensing and contracts; employment; trademark; domain name disputes; and federal and state privacy statutes.


About the Author

Tom Field

Tom Field

Vice President - Editorial, ISMG

Field is responsible for all of ISMG's 28 global media properties and its diverse cadre of senior-level editors and reporters. He also helped to develop and lead ISMG's award-winning Summit series that has brought together security practitioners and industry influencers from around the world, as well as ISMG's series of exclusive executive roundtables.




Around the Network