Be Mindful of Insider Fraud Against Seniors
California's Financial Abuse Reporting Act, SB 1018, which r…
Eligible |
![]() |
U.S. law enforcement agents are following people into popular social-networking sites, going undercover with false online profiles to communicate with suspects, gather private information and view photos and videos that are restricted to a user's network. Their main intention is to trail and catch criminals, tax evaders and other wrongdoers, as well as gather evidence to support their cases.
"Whatever feds do on social media impacts your career," says Michele Porfilio, strategic sourcing director for Crowe Horwath LLP, a public accounting and consulting firm. "Especially when there is inconsistency in information posted, as well as information you will be easily embarrassed by."
Information on social media sites has been used against employees in ways ranging from performance evaluation to legal risk. For example, when an employee files for disability compensation and during the same period posts pictures of physical activity. "There are real concerns in terms of how social media can affect your employment status and potential job opportunities by what you do on a daily basis on these sites," says Porfilio.
Recently, a San Francisco-based civil rights advocacy group, the Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) sued the Justice Department and five other federal agencies under the Freedom of Information Act to force the government to disclose its policies for using social networking sites in investigations, data collection and surveillance.
As a result of the lawsuit, the foundation obtained documents from the Department of Justice and the Internal Revenue Service that describe the value of Facebook, Twitter, MySpace, LinkedIn and other sites.
However, the boundaries are still unclear. "These documents don't really discuss any mechanisms for accountability or ensuring that government agents use those tools responsibly," says Marcia Hofmann, a senior attorney with the Electronic Frontier Foundation.
"There needs to be a proper justifiable framework and procedure in place to understand the parameters for such type of activity to occur," says David Navetta, founding partner of the Information Law Group and co-chair of the American Bar Association's information security committee. "So far there is no procedure to hold the government responsible or remedies for individuals whose privacy may have been compromised as a result of these investigations."
7 Tips for Job Seeker's Safety
From a job seeker's perspective, one needs to be consistent in one's activities and information posted about employment history, business references and recommendations provided. "The slightest conflict in their profiles can make them a potential target for fraud and ruin their online reputation," says Porfilio.
The employer, on the other hand, needs to ensure that online hiring practices are fair and not discriminatory. How do they source their candidates? What kind of background checks do they perform? What are their typical factors for selection? "These investigations are only likely to get more widespread and intense, pushing the need for transparency in the employer-employee relationship," says Porfilio.
Tips for ensuring online safety include:
The Electronic Funds Transfer (EFT) Act - Regulation E..Next Topic
The Electronic Funds Transfer (EFT) Act - Regulation E..Next Topic
DoJ: Report to Congress on Implementation of Section 1001 of the USA PATRIOT Act..Next Topic
FFIEC Issues 2009 Mortgage Fraud White Paper:The Detection and Deterrence of Mortgage..Next Topic
FDIC: Fraudulent Work-at-Home Funds Transfer Agent Schemes..Next Topic
Joint Statement by Education Secretary Duncan, Homeland Security Secretary Napolitano and..Next Topic
Obama's Cyberspace Policy Review: Assuring a Trusted and Resilient Information and..Next Topic
Obama's Cyberspace Policy Review: Assuring a Trusted and Resilient Information and..Next Topic
NIST: PIV Card Application and Middleware Interface Test Guidelines, SP800-85A-1..Next Topic