Scared Straight: Funding Disaster Recovery
Headline-grabbing catastrophes get the boss' attention.…
Eligible |
"Give us your broke, your desperate, your unemployed." This is the tacit plea from fraudsters seeking to lure new "money mules" to enable their money-laundering schemes.
And the recruitment effort is working to the point that the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) last week issued an alert to financial institutions about the increasing number of money mules - many of them unknowingly - using U.S. financial institution accounts to help overseas criminals launder money.
The alert listed some of the different ways these accomplices operate, and the FDIC stressed that financial institution are required to file Suspicious Activity Reports (SARs)and take necessary steps to close down suspected money mule accounts.
The FDIC says money mule schemes can take many different forms, but most involve receiving unauthorized electronic fund transfers (EFTs) into a deposit account and then withdrawing the funds or forwarding them on to another party via another EFT.
These are some tipoffs cited by the FDIC that could indicate money mule account activity:
Among the ways fraudsters are recruiting often-unwitting mules:
Desperate people do desperate things, or are conned into believing the money laundering is legitimate, says Uri Rivner, a security researcher at RSA in Israel who has seen many criminal money mule offers. "Most times the unwitting money mules don't realize they are part of a money laundering ring until their bank or law enforcement agencies contact them," Rivner says.
Typically, money mules are recruited, given some story, receive money transfers, take the money out and wire it internationally to a money drop. Then the money goes to the cash-out fraudsters. Rivner described the detailed lifecycle of how online fraud occurs in an earlier interview.
Even if the customer is an unwitting money mule, "The fraud laws say it is not just the bank's sole responsibility," says Nancy Atkinson, Senior Analyst at Aite Group, a Boston, MA-based financial services industry research firm.
"Most banks try to help get the money back, but in most cases of these money mules, the money is sent via Western Union, and there is no way to get it back," she explains. Though the recession is bad and people think they're being asked to do something that doesn't look illegal, they can still be held liable, Atkinson notes.
Financial institutions can do more to protect their customers, says Elaine Dodd, vice president, Fraud Division, Oklahoma Bankers Association.
"Your customers think they have landed the perfect Internet job and may not be inclined to be suspicious," Dodd says. "It's simple. You must educate your customers."
|
The Electronic Funds Transfer (EFT) Act - Regulation E..Next Topic
The Electronic Funds Transfer (EFT) Act - Regulation E..Next Topic
FFIEC Issues 2009 Mortgage Fraud White Paper:The Detection and Deterrence of Mortgage..Next Topic
DoJ: Report to Congress on Implementation of Section 1001 of the USA PATRIOT Act..Next Topic
FDIC: Fraudulent Work-at-Home Funds Transfer Agent Schemes..Next Topic
Joint Statement by Education Secretary Duncan, Homeland Security Secretary Napolitano and..Next Topic
Obama's Cyberspace Policy Review: Assuring a Trusted and Resilient Information and..Next Topic
Obama's Cyberspace Policy Review: Assuring a Trusted and Resilient Information and..Next Topic
NIST: PIV Card Application and Middleware Interface Test Guidelines, SP800-85A-1..Next Topic