Be Mindful of Insider Fraud Against Seniors
California's Financial Abuse Reporting Act, SB 1018, which r…
Eligible |
![]() |
A federal judicial panel will hear arguments next week on whether to consolidate the class action lawsuits brought against Heartland Payment Systems (HPY) by financial institutions. The Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation in Louisville, KY will hear the arguments next Wednesday, according to Benjamin Johns, one of the lawyers representing the class action suit from the law firm of Chimicles & Tikellis, Haverford, PA.
"These cases tend to be long and drawn out - there have been multiple class action suits filed in New Jersey and in Texas," says Johns. Two class action suits have been filed by Chimicles & Tikellis, (New Jersey Filing PDF) (First Bankers Trust PDF), and a third class action suit was also filed in Texas against Heartland by Lone Star National Bank, Pharr, TX. (Lonestar Filing PDF).
As first reported on Jan. 20, Heartland, the sixth-largest payments processor in the U.S., revealed that its processing systems were breached in 2008, exposing an undetermined number of consumers to potential fraud.
Since then, a growing number of banking institutions have stepped forward to announce that their customers were among those affected by the breach.
About the Lawsuits
Johns says that generally multiple class action suits are consolidated and heard in one court. "Nothing of substance has happened before this," he says. "The court, once it hears the argument, will take anywhere from a month or two to release its ruling on where the suit will be heard."
Motions have been made to hear the case in Florida, Texas and New Jersey US district courts, says Johns.
There are three types of class action suits being brought against Heartland: the financial institutions' class action suits; consumer cases; and also some securities fraud class action suits have been filed by Heartland's investors. Johns says there are a total of 30 suits filed against Heartland in various federal courts.
There are five banks and credit unions named as plaintiffs in the New Jersey filing: Amalgamated Bank, New York, NY; Matadors Community Credit Union, Chatsworth, CA; GECU, El Paso, TX; MidFlorida Federal Credit Union, Lakeland, FL; and Farmers State Bank, Marcus, IA. All the institutions say they have had to re-issue "substantial" numbers of credit and debit cards because of the Heartland breach. Johns says thus far no other financial institutions have been named to the suit, but that doesn't mean others won't be joining.
"We've talked to a lot of banks and credit unions and gathering their information," Johns says. "Once the cases are consolidated we'll be making a determination of who will be added to consolidated complaint."
The number of financial institutions that have publicly announced their customers credit cards have been compromised because of the Heartland breach is now over 625. "They have to pay for reissuing the cards, and many of them have fraud on those cards that they are going to be responsible for," Johns says. Under the institutions' agreements with credit card companies, Johns estimates only about 20 percent of the costs of the credit card breach would be covered, including the cost to reissue the cards.
The Electronic Funds Transfer (EFT) Act - Regulation E..Next Topic
The Electronic Funds Transfer (EFT) Act - Regulation E..Next Topic
DoJ: Report to Congress on Implementation of Section 1001 of the USA PATRIOT Act..Next Topic
FFIEC Issues 2009 Mortgage Fraud White Paper:The Detection and Deterrence of Mortgage..Next Topic
FDIC: Fraudulent Work-at-Home Funds Transfer Agent Schemes..Next Topic
Joint Statement by Education Secretary Duncan, Homeland Security Secretary Napolitano and..Next Topic
Obama's Cyberspace Policy Review: Assuring a Trusted and Resilient Information and..Next Topic
Obama's Cyberspace Policy Review: Assuring a Trusted and Resilient Information and..Next Topic
NIST: PIV Card Application and Middleware Interface Test Guidelines, SP800-85A-1..Next Topic