BankInfoSecurity.com - Information Security News, Regulations, & Education

Bank Information Security Articles

Heartland Data Breach: Is End-to-End Encryption the Answer?

Credit
Eligible
As a BankInfoSecurity.com annual member, this content can be used toward your membership credits and transcript tracking. Click For More Info
Experts Say New Measure is a Start, but Industry Standards are Needed
May 11, 2009 - Linda McGlasson, Managing Editor
Share

Comment on this article

The announcement by Heartland Payment Systems (HPY) that it will offer its merchants end-to-end encryption capabilities is seen as a positive step by industry experts. Yet, these same experts also warn that this measure will not solve all of the security issues that Heartland and other payment processors face from hackers.

In Heartland's first-quarter earnings call last Thursday, company officials said so far last year's well-publicized data breach has cost them $12.6 million. The amount includes legal costs and fines from Visa and MasterCard, both of which have stated the payment processor wasn't compliant with PCI standards at the time of the breach. Visa had taken Heartland off of its preferred payment processor list earlier in March after the breach was made public on January 20. Heartland announced it had been recertified and was reinstated onto Visa's list of PCI-DSS validated service providers on April 30.

The plans that Heartland announced will protect the company's processing network with an end-to-end encryption system. Company officials say plans are to begin rolling out the solution to its merchants in the third quarter of this year. The merchants would pay for the installation of the equipment, but Heartland is already spending "millions" on developing the technology solution with a yet-unnamed technology provider.

Click to Get Updates on the Latest Information Security News

Is End-to-End Encryption The Answer?

Heartland is seen by some industry experts as making the right move in calling for a standard for encryption within the payment industry. But, the work required to get a standard accepted can take time, says David Taylor founder of the PCI Knowledge Base. "A standard is needed to make this work. In the absence of one, encrypted processing can be more of a 'customer lock-in' feature for the processors. It makes it that much harder to switch processors and/or acquiring banks because of the additional technical and procedural investment," Taylor says.

The drawback for each processor to offer their own versions of encryption is, "The more versions exist, the harder it will be to get merchants, processors and acquirers to adopt a standard," says Taylor. He knows from experience, as he worked in the EDI/E-commerce arena when standards were being developed in the 1990s. It took 10 years, "So I know it can take a long time."

Heartland Raises Bar on Security

Heartland is raising the bar in retail payments security by bringing end-to-end encryption to its network. It will be expensive and a big logistical challenge to execute, but the company has little choice other than to take a security leadership role on the heels of its near-catastrophic data breach last year, says Tom Wills, Senior Analyst, Security, Fraud & Compliance, Javelin Strategy and Research. He compares Heartland's situation and action to the Israeli airline El Al's actions to bolster its security processes. "El Al, after it suffered repeated hijackings in the 1970s, went on to become the world's most secure airline. Heartland will need to do the same thing in the acquiring industry to regain the credibility it has lost," Wills notes.

As long as it's accompanied by good policy and process, Heartland's encryption initiative will plug a definite security gap in the payments system. "But just as with PCI compliance or any other security control, this shouldn't be viewed as 'finally providing security,' but rather as an important new security layer in a multidimensional system of layers," Wills says. There will always be a continually shifting set of threats and vulnerabilities: the trick is to track that moving target effectively via a feedback loop of continual risk assessments and security upgrades, he concludes.

As a top 10 payment processor, Heartland can have a substantial influence over payment card processing in the future. The proposal for end-to-end encryption is about the best Heartland can do as a processor, but it's limited by the processor's ability to influence change, says Avivah Litan, Distinguished Analyst, at Gartner Group, a Stamford, CT-based IT research firm. "In other words, for this to be very effective, it should ultimately work like PIN encryption works today - i.e., PINs are encrypted all the way from the merchant to the card issuers," Litan says.


1 | 2




Question
Question
?How do you feel about Heartland's end-to-end encryption initiative?
Here's your chance to be a part of the dialogue and engage with your peers! Just enter your comment to the right, click submit to send it to our Editor. All entries are posted anonymously.
Please login if you would like to post a comment on this question.

"The problem at Heartland, as best as we will ever permitted to know, was that transaction data was in the clear on the internal network. E2E in this case is from the user's system to the application, not from the merchant to Heartland. As the first commenter noted, E2E to the POS is not from the POS device but from the card. We already have a standard for that. It is called EMV. Amex, MC and Visa all have it in operation in select markets. As far as I know, Heartland is not the only independent processor who does not subscribe.

When Heartland says "we need a standard," it means we need a standard that imposes the cost on someone else.
"Where exactly are the ends in "end-to-end" encryption? If data is not encrypted all the way through to the cards' schemes, then at some point within the processor's infrastructure, card details will be in the clear and still vulnerable to theft.

Key management is next to impossible in software-only systems like shopping carts. PIN encryption is workable because it's done in terminal hardware, but how will encryption of card details work at merchants accepting Card Not Present transactions? If credit card details are coming in over the web and being encrypted at the processor, then there's another weak point where data is in the clear.
"E2E Encryption Prescription Is Bad Medicine

Encrypted traffic cannot be analyzed by a firewall unless either decrypted permissively or decrypted forcibly. The same traffic cannot be cleansed of viruses, or worm signatures, or attack characteristics (IIS URL length overflow) until the traffic is decrypted on the host. Clearly, traffic should never hit a multi-purpose operating system until after all of this happens. End-to-end encryption is what we want, but not at the price we'd have to pay. Protection of data during creation, transmission, processing and storage or End-to-End-Defense-in-Depth is what we really want, as it ensures the defense in depth best practices are not lost.