BankInfoSecurity.com - Information Security News, Regulations, & Education

Bank Information Security Articles

Heartland Payment Systems, Forcht Bank Discover Data Breaches

Credit
Eligible
As a BankInfoSecurity.com annual member, this content can be used toward your membership credits and transcript tracking. Click For More Info
Both Companies Might be Victims of Larger Fraud Schemes
January 21, 2009 - Linda McGlasson, Managing Editor
Share

Comment on this article

Heartland Payment Systems, the sixth-largest payments processor in the U.S., announced Monday that its processing systems were breached in 2008, exposing an undetermined number of consumers to potential fraud.

Meanwhile, Forcht Bank, one of the 10 largest banks in Kentucky, told its customers it would begin reissuing 8,500 debit cards after being informed by its own card processor of a possible breach. Heartland Payment Systems data breach coverage

In the case of Heartland, while the company continues to assess the damages inflicted by the attack, Robert Baldwin, the company's president and CFO, says law enforcement has already noted that the attack against his company is part of a wider cyber fraud operation.

"The indication that it is tied to wider cyber fraud operation comes directly from conversations with the Department of Justice and the U.S. Secret Service," Baldwin says. The company says it believes the breach has been contained.

Heartland, headquartered in Princeton, NJ, handles approximately 100 million transactions per month, although the number of unique cardholders is much lower. "It is still a question as to the percentage of the data flow they were able to get," Baldwin says, adding he would not speculate on the number of cards potentially exposed.

Specifics surrounding when the breach occurred are still being analyzed. But Baldwin says two forensic auditing teams have been working on the breach analysis and investigation since late 2008, after Heartland received the notification from Visa and MasterCard. The investigation began immediately after the credit card companies told Heartland they saw suspicious activity surrounding processed card transactions. Described by Baldwin as "quite a sophisticated attack," he says it has been challenging to discover exactly how it happened.

Click to Get Updates on the Latest Information Security News

The forensic teams found that hackers "were grabbing numbers with sniffer malware as it went over our processing platform," Baldwin says. "Unfortunately, we are confident that card holder names and numbers were exposed."

Data, including card transactions sent over Heartland's internal processing platform, is sent unencrypted, he explains, "As the transaction is being processed, it has to be in unencrypted form to get the authorization request out."

No merchant data or cardholder Social Security numbers, unencrypted personal identification numbers (PIN), addresses or telephone numbers were involved in the breach. Nor were any of Heartland's check management systems. The company delivers credit/debit/prepaid card processing, payroll, check management and payments solutions to more than 250,000 business locations nationwide Baldwin says the company moved quickly to announce the breach. "It is important to get it out, but leaves us with incomplete information for our customers until the investigation is complete," he says. For more information on the breach, the company has set up a website: www.2008breach.com. Heartland advises cardholders to examine their monthly statements closely and report any suspicious activity to their card issuers.

Forcht Bank: "Not Isolated"

In a statement to Forcht Bank's customers, COO Tyronica Crutcher says that the bank's debit card processor, STAR, informed the bank that a retail merchant processor's information may have been compromised, and that some unknown persons are possibly creating duplicate debit cards.

"According to STAR, there are several other banks affected, and this is not isolated to Forcht Bank customers," says Crutcher.

Forcht Bank has 34 branches in 11 counties, with more than $1 billion in assets.






Question
Question
?Another day, another reported breach. What's your biggest unanswered question about this news?
Here's your chance to be a part of the dialogue and engage with your peers! Just enter your comment to the right, click submit to send it to our Editor. All entries are posted anonymously.
Please login if you would like to post a comment on this question.

"At what point does the bank have a duty to inform its customers that they have been identified as a potential breach candidate?
"How are computers in the internal processing environment (the only area unencrypted data should reside) susceptible to malware? All the input devices should be locked down- and please don't say those machines had internet access and (users) were able to visit websites or download!

And if the above is indeed locked down- why was traffic allowed out of the environment? The malware had to communicate with its host(s) to transfer the data- no machine in that environment should have the ability to send any data via any protocol over any port with the exception of the sole processor required destination.

Surely by now both STAR and Heartland have been through PCI audits- how did this pass?

Hopefully the PCI council takes quick action on this- merchants and banks are not going to be happy with the resources and time spent becoming compliant over the past three years only to have their processors remain wide open.
"The bank has been put on notice by its credit card and ATM/debit processors that many of our accounts have been placed on a possible breach/compromise list. Yesterday the bank participated in a conference call with members of Mastercard and the Massachusetts Bankers Assoication. Unfortunately not a great deal of concrete information was provided.

My question at this point is:

At what point does the bank have a duty to inform its customers that they have been identified as a potential breach candidate?
"WHY?? Why are major companies still not required to install security measures to stop or at least monitor the possibility of a data breach? If all of the merchants were held responsible for reimbursing the banks for losses and the cost of reissuing cards, they would take a few more precautions.